INSIGHTS
Terry Drabant, Emeritus Director, Air Force Academy Foundation
Keywords: leadership empathy, two-way empathy, leader-subordinate relationships, leader development, military leadership
Citation: Journal of Character and Leadership Development 2026, 13(1): 370. https://doi.org/10.58315/jcld.v13.370
Copyright: © 2026 The author(s)
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.
CONTACT: Terry Drabant terrydrabant@gmail.com
Published: 09 April 2026
Empathy is the ability to understand and share the feelings, concerns and motivations of others. Empathy creates trust between leaders and subordinates.
I say trust between leaders and subordinates because trust is a “two-way street.” Subordinates will not trust a leader who does not trust them. A leader will not trust subordinates who do not trust the leader. For empathy to be effective at creating trust, empathy itself must also be a two-way street. That is why effective leaders have empathy for subordinates—and why effective leaders work to develop in their subordinates empathy for the leader, helping them better understand the challenges, constraints, and responsibilities that come with leadership.
When subordinates trust leaders and leaders trust subordinates, their combined efforts become far more effective.
A large body of research highlights the importance of leaders showing empathy toward their followers, demonstrating its positive effects on motivation, well-being, and performance (Kock et al., 2019; Muss et al., 2025). Far less attention has been paid to follower-to-leader empathy or to how leaders can actively foster upward empathy. Even theories that address mutual relationships, such as Leader–Member Exchange, tend to treat follower empathy as an outcome of leadership behaviors rather than a skill to be deliberately cultivated (Graen and Uhl-Bien, 1995). Developing this kind of two-way empathy has the potential to deepen trust and shared purpose between leaders and followers, making it especially vital in contexts where teams face difficult or high-stakes tasks.
This article offers a practical framework for building such two-way empathy. I describe “ten tips” for leaders to develop empathy for subordinates while also fostering in subordinates a deeper empathy for leadership itself
This is a statement of skills and experience.
The Fighter Squadron Commander should be an experienced fighter pilot. The manager of a software development department should be an experienced software engineer. The leader’s prior experience can create empathy for subordinates because the leader has experienced the difficulties that the subordinates are now experiencing. Likewise, subordinates may have empathy for the leader because they understand that the leader has the experience to understand the subordinates’ difficulties.
It is not necessary for the leader to be the best at the task. It is necessary that the leader be a good teacher for subordinates needing improvement. As French and Raven showed in their foundational work on the bases of social power, leaders who demonstrate competence earn respect and trust (French and Raven, 1959). Absent relevant prior experience, a leader’s attempt to teach subordinates will expose the leader’s incompetence.
It may be best to decline a new position if one does not have the requisite prior experience.
I know of no better way of building a leader’s empathy for subordinates and subordinates’ empathy for the leader than to take the time to teach. Ingredients are:
To build empathy with subordinates, leaders must demonstrate that they are motivated by the good of the organization, and by the good of their subordinates, rather than by self-interest. This must be apparent in the leader’s words and actions.
There is a saying: “The cream rises to the top—and so does the scum.” Subordinates do not have empathy for scum. Subordinates find ways to undermine those they perceive as motivated by self-interest.
To build and maintain empathy among subordinates a leader must not abuse special privileges available to them and must not abuse power over subordinates. Abuse of special privileges will be noted by subordinates and will reduce their feelings of empathy. Ingredients are:
As Lord Acton observed, “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely” (Acton, 1887/1907, p. 504). The more powerful a leader becomes, the more important the leader’s restraint and avoidance of abuse of that power. Ingredients are:
How then should a leader exercise their power over subordinates? Empathetic leaders are not petty, cynical or sarcastic. They are advised: “Always be tactful and well-mannered and teach your subordinates to be the same. Avoid excessive sharpness or harshness of voice, which usually indicates the man who has shortcomings of his own to hide” (Rommel, 1953, p. 239).
The objective is results. When results are not forthcoming the objective is education and training. Violations must be punished, but the empathetic leader does not gain satisfaction from punishing.
The empathetic leader shows respect for subordinates’ abilities by assessing their ability to successfully perform a task. It is destructive to empathy between leader and subordinate to either underestimate or overestimate the ability of a subordinate to perform a task. Ingredients are:
Note that these management models assume that the leader and subordinate are correct and in agreement with respect to the subordinate’s ability to perform the task. When leader and subordinate are not in agreement, it is best not to proceed until a more coherent understanding between leader and subordinate is reached. Moreover, as the assignment progresses, it may become evident that the subordinate does not have the ability to perform the task that both leader and subordinate initially thought they had. In these cases movement from one management model to another will be necessary.
Critically important to the success of a leader is the establishment and enforcement of a meritocracy within the organization. Individuals should be selected for promotion based on their superior likelihood of success. This is the definition of a true meritocracy. There is no room for nepotism, cronyism, promoting someone that the rest of the organization does not believe is the best candidate, or promoting from the outside when there is an equally qualified candidate inside the organization. Note that promoting from within usually results in multiple promotions as the positions of the promoted subordinates need replacements.
Empathetic leaders never critique a subordinate in front of their peers or subordinates. Ingredients are:
This is a subtle phenomenon. In some cases the best strategy for the empathetic leader is to “stand back” and allow the subordinate to be impacted by the consequences of their own poor performance. There is no need for a leader to point out the benefits of a raincoat to a rain-soaked subordinate. Poor performance can be its own learning experience.
An empathetic leader has concern for the well-being of subordinates. When a subordinate is experiencing difficulties outside the workplace it must be second nature for the empathetic leader to be concerned, to show concern, and to provide assistance where possible and appropriate. Some adjustments at the workplace may be helpful. This needs to be genuine. One cannot successfully fake concern for others.
Empathetic leaders need to assess and develop empathy for subordinates. They need to know “where they stand” with their subordinates. Empathetic leaders also need to assess and develop the empathy that subordinates feel toward them. These leadership traits need to be authentic. It is not possible to fake empathy.
Leaders, especially military leaders, are called upon to ask subordinates to undertake difficult, even heroic assignments. If the leader has built a reservoir of empathy with subordinates and subordinates with the leader, subordinates will willingly do what they are asked to do. Absent empathy flowing in both directions, the result will not be ideal.
| Acton, J. E. E. D. (1907). Historical essays and studies (J. N. Figgis and R. V. Laurence, Eds.). Macmillan. |
| French, J. R. P., Jr., and Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. P. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan. |
| Graen, G. B., and Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader–member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5 |
| Kock, N., Mayfield, M., Mayfield, J., Sexton, S., and De La Garza, L. M. (2019). Empathetic leadership: How leader emotional support and understanding influences follower performance. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 26(2), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051818806290 |
| Muss, C., Tüxen, D., and Fürstenau, B. (2025). Empathy in leadership: A systematic literature review on the effects of empathetic leaders in organizations. Management Review Quarterly 76, 333–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-024-00472-7 |
| Rommel, E. (1953). The Rommel papers (B. H. Liddell Hart, Ed.; P. Findlay, Trans.). Harcourt, Brace. |