Character in English-Language Military Leadership Doctrine

Authors

  • Hans Christian Breede Canadian Defence Academy, Department of National Defence
  • Mary Crossan Ivey Business School, Western Univeristy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58315/jcld.v13.339

Keywords:

character, leadership, doctrine, military, anglosphere

Abstract

Background: Character is widely recognized as a critical aspect of individual and group performance, and character’s applicability to the military is no exception. Character serves as an explicit entry requirement, a desired outcome within training institutions, and a focal point of emphasis across various military organizations.
Objective: This article examines how character is discussed within military leadership doctrine and how it is framed. More specifically, how has “good character” been understood and measured?
Methods: This study examined the leadership doctrine of six English-speaking militaries using the Leader Character Framework (LCF), a framework developed in recent leadership scholarship, to identify the dimensions of character that are emphasized. This examination is carried out using a simple quantitative analysis technique, using the keywords in the LCF as specific recording units.
Results: The findings revealed that while the six militaries identified similar character dimensions, they also displayed a lack of emphasis on several important dimensions, which could lead to character imbalances. Research on the LCF suggests that such imbalances can manifest in vices of deficiency or excess, rather than the intended virtuous state.Results: The findings revealed that while the six militaries identified similar character dimensions, they also displayed a lack of emphasis on several important dimensions, which could lead to character imbalances. Research on the LCF suggests that such imbalances can manifest in vices of deficiency or excess, rather than the intended virtuous state.
Conclusions: This study offers several avenues for further research and highlights specific aspects of character that should be reinforced and emphasized to enhance military leadership.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aristotle. (2001). Nicomachean ethics. In R. McKeon (Ed.). The Basic Works of Aristotle (pp. 935–1112). (W. D. Ross, Trans.). The Modern Library. (Original work published ca. 350 B.C.E.).

Australian Army. (2021). LWD 0–2 Leadership. Australian Army. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&-source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://131acu.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/lwd_0-2_leadership.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjd16Xy1vSRAxVEM1k-FHSf7N9kQFnoECB0QAQ&usg=AOvVaw1dhCq3xtAHwHRRpm1437fZ

Australian Defence Force. (2021). ADF-P-0 ADF Leadership (3rd ed.). Australian Defence Force. https://theforge.defence.gov.au/doctrine-audiobooks/adf-philosophical-doctrine-adf-leadership

Australian Defence Force. (2023). ADF-P-0 ADF Character in the Profession of Arms. Australian Defence Force. https://theforge.defence.gov.au/doctrine-audiobooks/character-doctrine

Boe, O., Bang, H., and Nilsen, F. A. (2015). Experienced military officer’s perception of important character strengths. Procedia—Social and Behavioural Sciences, 190, 339–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.05.008

Breede, H. C., and Coombs, H. (2024). Canada. In S. Von Felten, P. Hofstetter, and M. Holenweger (Eds.), Military Leadership Concepts: An International Perspective (pp. 63–86). The Swiss Armed Forces.

Burke, A., and Brewster, M. (2023, October 21). A military in crisis: Here are the senior leaders embroiled in sexual misconduct cases. CBC News. https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/sexual-misconduct-military-senior-leaders-dnd-caf-1.6218683

Crossan, C., and Crossan, M. (2023). The practice of developing leader character to elevate judgment. In T. Newstead and R. Riggio (Eds.), Leadership and Virtues: Understanding and Practicing Good Leadership (pp. 210–226). Routledge.

Crossan, M., Byrne, A., Seijts, G. H., Reno, M., Monzani, L., and Gandz, J. (2017). Towards a framework of leader character in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 54(7), 7–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12254

Crossan, M., Crossan, C., and Furlong, B. (2024a). Cracking the code: Strategic impact of leader character development for competitive advantage. Amplify, 36, 8–17.

Crossan, M., Crossan, C., Newstead, T., and Sturm, R. E. (2024b). Developing leader character: Finding a way forward. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 12(2), 1–24.

Crossan, M., Furlong, B., and Crossan, C. (2025). Diagnosing and strategically implementing a character-based culture. Leader to Leader, 117, 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/ltl.20898

Crossan, M., Seijts, G., and Furlong, B. (2024c). The Character Compass: Transforming Leadership for the 21st Century. Routledge.

Damian, R. I., Spengler, M., Sutu, A., and Roberts, B.W. (2019). Sixteen going on sixty-six: A longitudinal study of personality stability and change across 50 years. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(3), 674–695. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000210

Defence Forces Ireland. (2023). Defence Forces Leadership Doctrine (2nd ed.). DFDM-J2. Defence Forces Printing Press. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.military.ie/media/03bmogik/defence-forces-leadership-doctrine-first-edition.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjGr5P-kuOSAxUCC3k-GHZPpAj0QFnoECCEQAQ&usg=AOvVaw-0IsZIlxentrzLYiDu_czVV

Department of National Defence. (2005a). Leadership in the Canadian Forces: Conceptual Foundations. Canadian Defence Academy. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/9.697209/publication.html&ved=2ahUKEwiJ09uK2PSRAxVfFlkFHdDxEI8QFnoECAwQAQ&usg=AOvVaw3NCpRbWE9VObv8MRIspGt8

Department of National Defence. (2005b). Leadership in the Canadian Forces: Doctrine. Canadian Defence Academy. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2013/dn-nd/D2-313-1-2005-eng.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwie_o2X2PSRAxXqF1kFHdJdFTkQFnoECCQQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0Oj9-p5Kmhm3gGFcCKZfIC

Department of National Defence. (2007a). Leadership in the Canadian Forces: Leading People. Canadian Defence Academy. https://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/436665/publication.html

Department of National Defence. (2007b). Leadership in the Canadian Forces: Leading the Institution. Canadian Defence Academy. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2013/dn-nd/D2-313-5-2007-eng.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjr_oLI2PSRAx-WRLFkFHQijENQQFnoECAwQAQ&us-g=AOvVaw3mq0tvLzgltZPYCgEuSFRi

Department of National Defence. (2022). The Canadian Armed Forces Ethos: Trusted to Serve. Canadian Defence Academy. https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/corporate/reports-publications/canadian-armed-forces-ethos-trusted-to-serve.html

Department of National Defence. (2024). Fighting Spirit: The Profession of Arms in Canada. Canadian Defence Academy. https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/corporate/reports-publications/fighting-spirit.html

Department of the Air Force. (2023a). AFDP 1-1 Mission Command. Department of the Air Force. https://www.doctrine.af.mil/Operational-Level-Doctrine/AFDP-1-1-Mission-Command/

Department of the Air Force. (2023b). Guardian Spirit: Space Force Handbook 1-1. United States Space Force. https://share.google/9TsyuVOGl52MVM4aG

Department of the Army. (2018). Educating Army Leaders: Developing Intellect and Character to Navigate a Diverse and Dynamic World. United States Military Academy. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GOVPUB-D109-PURL-gpo130424

Department of the Army. (2025). FM-1 A Primer to Our Profession of Arms. Department of the Army. https://share.google/szKTU3l2Ni7XteWQ0

Department of the Navy. (2019). Navy Leader Development Framework (3rd ed.). Chief of Naval Operations. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GOVPUB-D207-PURL-gpo124848

Department of the Navy. (2024). MCWP 6-10 Leading Marines. Headquarters of the United States Marine Corps. https://www.marines.mil/News/Publications/MCPEL/Electronic-Library-Display/Article/899578/mcwp-6-10/

Ender, M. G. (2008). Sociology at West Point. Armed Forces and Society, 35, 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X08314968

Hamre, J. (2016). Reflections: Looking back at the need for Goldwater-Nichols. Defense360. https://defense360.csis.org/goldwater-nichols-2016/

Høiback, H. (2013). Understanding Military Doctrine: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Routledge.

McChrystal, S. (2025). On Character: Choices that Define a Life. Portfolio.

McKitrick, J. S., and Chiarelli, P. W. (1984). Defense reform: An appraisal. In A. A. Clark, IV, P. W. Chiarelli, J. S. McKitrick, and J. W. Reed (Eds.), The Defense Reform Debate, Issues, and Analysis (p. 324). Johns Hopkins University Press.

Ministry of Defence. (2021). AC 72029 Army Leadership Doctrine. Centre for Army Leadership. https://www.army.mod.uk/support-and-training/ourschools-and-colleges/centre-for-army-leadership/army-leadership-publications/

Mordacci, R. (2021). Three concepts of character. Phenomenology and Mind, 21, 154–166. https://doi.org/10.17454/pam-2112

New Zealand Defence Force. (2018). NZDDP-00.6 Leadership. Headquarters New Zealand Defence Force. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&-source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://fyi.org.nz/request/18385/response/73806/attach/6/NZDDP%252000.6.pdf&ved=2a-hUKEwjM6Yz52PSRAxUiD1kFHQe4Nl4QF-noECBgQAQ&usg=AOvVaw3-QQsgIW5-Kem-Lql3Q69UB

Niemiec, R. (2006). Mindfulness and Character Strengths: A Practitioner’s Guide to MBSP. Hogrefe.

Park, N., and Peterson, C. (2006). Moral competence and character strengths among adolescents: The development and validation of the values in action inventory of strengths for youth. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 891–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.04.011

Peterson, C., and Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification. Oxford University Press.

Queen’s Regulations and Order for the Canadian Armed Forces (Vol. I, Chapter 6.01). (2024). https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/corporate/policies-standards/queens-regulations-orders/vol-1-administration/ch-6-enrolment-reengagement/table-contents.html

Rea, P., Stoller, J. K., and Kolp, A. (2023). Better Humans, Better Performance: Driving Leadership, Teamwork, and Culture with Intentionality. McGraw-Hill.

Ricks, T. E. (2012). The Generals: American Military Command from World War II to Today. Penguin.

Royal Air Force. (2020). AP70001 Royal Air Force Leadership. Tedder Academy of Leadership. https://www.raf.mod.uk/documents/pdf/leadership-royal-air-force-ap7001/

Royal Australian Air Force. (2013). The Royal Australian Air Force Leadership Companion. Air Force Headquarters. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&-source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://theforge.defence.gov.au/article/royal-australian-air-force-leadership-companion&ved=2ahUKEwisufrR1_SRAxUKD1kFHUtUC4wQFnoECB0QAQ&usg=AOvVaw1nKNhhWCJZZ_KnTHHpaWHS

Royal Australian Navy. (2010). The Royal Australian Navy Leadership Ethic. Sea Power Centre. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=-j&opi=89978449&url=https://seapower.navy.gov.au/publications-and-research/royal-australian-navy-leadership-ethic&ved=2ahUKEwioxJji1_SRAx-UaEFkFHby7KK0QFnoECCQQAQ&usg=AOv-Vaw0KHZGazAuApCt1s_VyUtLV

Shay, J. (1994). Achilles in Vietnam: Combat Trauma and the Undoing of Character. Atheneum.

Taber, N. (2009). The profession of arms: Ideological codes and dominant narratives of gender in the Canadian Military. Atlantis, 34, 27–36. https://doi.org/10.7202/1120204ar

Von Clausewitz, C. (1976). On War. M. Howard and P. Paret (Eds.), Trans. Princeton University Press (Original work published 1832)

Wang, G., and Hackett, R. D. (2016). Conceptualization and measurement of virtuous leadership: Doing well by doing good. Journal of Business Ethics, 137, 321–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2560-1

Published

2026-04-09

How to Cite

Breede, H. C., & Crossan, M. (2026). Character in English-Language Military Leadership Doctrine. Journal of Character and Leadership Development, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.58315/jcld.v13.339

Issue

Section

Research

Categories