Ethical Leadership at Work and with Friends and Family: Within-Person and Between-Raters Variability Matters
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58315/jcld.v10.272Keywords:
Ethical Leadership, Multi-Domain Leadership, Levels of Analysis, Trust, Affective Trust, Cognitive Trust, Abusive SupervisionAbstract
Despite its theoretical grounding in the personal moral characteristics of leaders, most research on Brown et al.’s (2005) ethical leadership construct has tended to ignore the personal life (friends/family) aspects of leaders. In this study, we consider ethical leadership behavior in both work and non-work (i.e., with friends and family) domains at both the intra-individual (domain) and individual (leader as a whole person) levels of analysis. We examine our research questions with a sample of 104 leaders and their 1,458 raters in executive MBA programs in the United States and Ireland. Our findings demonstrate that ethical leadership operates at the individual level of analysis in both work and non-work contexts, with the implication that researchers should consider both the mean and variation of ethical leadership. Our findings also indicate strong within-domain and limited cross-domain effects of ethical leadership and ethical leadership variation on cognitive trust, affective trust, and abusive supervision.
Downloads
References
Bai, Y., Lin, L., & Liu, J. T. (2019). Leveraging the employee voice: A multi-level social learning perspective of ethical leadership. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(12), 1869–1901. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1308414
Bedi, A. C., Alpaslan, M., & Green, S. (2016). A meta-analytic review of ethical leadership outcomes and moderators. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(3), 517–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2625-1
Blasi, A. (1993). The development of identity: Some implications for moral functioning. In: G. G. Noam & T. E. Wren (Eds.), The moral self (pp. 99–122). MIT Press.
Bleidorn, W., & Denissen, J. (2015). Virtues in action—The new look of character traits. British Journal of Psychology, 106, 700–723. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12117
Bormann, K. C., Poethke, U., Cohrs, C., & Rowold, J. (2018). Doing bad through being selective in doing good: The role of within-unit variability in ethical leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27(6), 683–699. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1491550
Brett, J. F., & Atwater, L. E. (2001). 360° feedback: Accuracy, reactions, and perceptions of usefulness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 930–942. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.930
Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 595–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.004
Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117−134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002
Chua, R. Y. J., Ingram, P., & Morris, M. W. (2008). From the head and the heart: Locating cognition- and affect-based trust in managers’ professional networks. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 436–452. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.32625956
Chughtai, A., Byrne, M., & Flood, B. (2015). Linking ethical leadership to employee well-being: The role of trust in supervisor. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(3), 653–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2126-7
Courtright, S. H., Gardner, R. G., Smith, T. A., McCormick, B. W., & Colbert, A. E. (2016). My family made me do it: A cross-domain, self-regulatory perspective on antecedents to abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 59(5), 1630–1652. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.1009
Dansereau, F., Alutto, J. A., & Yammarino, F. J. (1984). Theory testing in organizational behavior: The varient approach. Prentice Hall.
De Hoogh, A. H. B., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2008). Ethical and despotic leadership relationships with leader’s social responsibility, top management effectiveness and subordinates’ optimism: A multimethod study. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.03.002
Den Hartog, D. N., & De Hoogh, A. H. B. (2009). Empowering behaviour and leader fairness and integrity: Studying perceptions of ethical leader behaviour from a levels-of-analysis perspective. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 18(2), 199–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320802362688
Dionne, S. D., Gupta, A., Sotak, K. L., Shirreffs, K. A., Serban, A., Hao, C., & Yammarino, F. J. (2014). A 25-year perspective on levels of analysis in leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 6–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.002
Dixon, M. A., & Cunningham, G. B. (2006). Data aggregation in multilevel analysis: A review of conceptual and statistical issues. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 10(2), 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327841mpee1002_2
Eisenbeiß, S. A., & Giessner, S. R. (2012). The emergence and maintenance of ethical leadership in organizations. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 11(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000055
Eisenbeiss, S. A., van Knippenberg, D., & Fahrbach, C. M. (2015). Doing well by doing good? Analyzing the relationship between CEO ethical leadership and firm performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(3), 635–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2124-9
Fleeson, W. (2007). Situation-based contingencies underlying trait content manifestation in behavior. Journal of Personality, 75, 825–861. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00458.x
Hammond, M., Clapp-Smith, R., & Palanski, M. (2017). Beyond (just) the workplace: A theory of leader development across multiple domains. Academy of Management Review, 42(3), 481–498. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0431
Hannah, S. T., Thompson, R. L., & Herbst, K. C. (2018). Moral identity complexity: Situated morality within and across work and social roles. Journal of Management, 46(5), 726–757. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318814166
Hoch, J. E., Bommer, W. H., Dulebohn, J. H., & Wu, D. (2018). Do ethical, authentic, and servant leadership explain variance above and beyond transformational leadership? A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 44(2), 501–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316665461
House, R., Javidan, M., Hanges, P., & Dorfman, P. (2002). Understanding cultures and implicit leadership theories across the globe: An introduction to project GLOBE. Journal of World Business, 37(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-9516(01)00069-4
Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., De Luque, M. S., & House, R. J. (2006). In the eye of the beholder: Cross cultural lessons in leadership from Project GLOBE. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(1), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315668703
Keck, N., Giessner, S. R., Van Quaquebeke, N., & Kruijff, E. (2018). When do followers perceive their leaders as ethical? A relational models perspective of normatively appropriate conduct. Journal of Business Ethics, 164(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4055-3
Klein, K. J., Dansereau, F., & Hall, R. J. (1994). Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 195–229. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1994.9410210745
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3–90). Jossey-Bass. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2000-16936-001
LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 815–852. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106296642
Lee, A., & Carpenter, N. C. (2018). Seeing eye to eye: A meta-analysis of self-other agreement of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(2), 253–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.06.002
Lester, H. F., Cullen-Lester, K. L., & Walters, R. W. (2021). From nuisance to novel research questions: Using multilevel models to predict heterogeneous variances. Organizational Research Methods, 24(2), 342–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428119887434
Liao, Y., Liu, X. Y., Kwan, H. K., & Li, J. (2015). Work–family effects of ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(3), 535–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2119-6
Lin, S. H., Scott, B. A., & Matta, F. K. (2019). The dark side of transformational leader behaviors for leaders themselves: A conservation of resources perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 62(5), 1556–1582. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.1255
Lin, S. H. J., Ma, J., & Johnson, R. E. (2016). When ethical leader behavior breaks bad: How ethical leader behavior can turn abusive via ego depletion and moral licensing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(6), 815–830. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/apl0000098
Magalhães, A., dos Santos, N. R., & Pais, L. (2019). Multi-source research designs on ethical leadership: A literature review. Business and Society Review, 124(3), 345–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12179
Mayer, D. M., Aquino, K., Greenbaum, R. L., & Kuenzi, M. (2012). Who displays ethical leadership, and why does it matter? An examination of antecedents and consequences of ethical leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 151–171. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.0276
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
Mitchell, M. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2007). Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1159
Newman, A., Kiazad, K., Miao, Q., & Cooper, B. (2014). Examining the cognitive and affective trust-based mechanisms underlying the relationship between ethical leadership and organisational citizenship: A case of the head leading the heart? Journal of Business Ethics, 123(1), 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1803-2
Newstead, T., Dawkins, S., Macklin, R., & Martin, A. (2021). We don’t need more leaders—We need more good leaders Advancing a virtues-based approach to leader (ship) development. J The Leadership Quarterly, 32, 101312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101312
Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2015). Ethical leadership: Meta-analytic evidence of criterion-related and incremental validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 948–965. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038246
Palanski, M. E., & Yammarino, F. J. (2011). Impact of behavioral integrity on follower job performance: A three-study examination. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(4), 765–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.05.014
Riggio, R. E., Zhu, W., Reina, C., & Maroosis, J. A. (2010). Virtue-based measurement of ethical leadership: The Leadership Virtues Questionnaire. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 62(4), 235–250. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022286
Roberson, Q. M., Sturman, M. C., & Simons, T. L. (2007). Does the measure of dispersion matter in multilevel research? A comparison of the relative performance of dispersion indexes. Organizational Research Methods, 10(4), 564–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106294746
Simons, T., Leroy, H., Collewaert, V., & Masschelein, S. (2015). How leader alignment of words and deeds affects followers: A meta-analysis of behavioral integrity research. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(4), 831–844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2332-3
Sturm, R. E., Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2017). The entanglement of leader character and leader competence and its impact on performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(3), 349–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.11.007
Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556375
Tepper, B. J. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33(3), 261–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307300812
Yammarino, F. J. (1998). Multivariate aspects of the varient/WABA approach: A discussion and leadership illustration. The Leadership Quarterly, 9(2), 203–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(98)90005-4
Yammarino, F. J., & Bass, B. M. (1990). Transformational leadership and multiple levels of analysis. Human Relations, 43(10), 975–995. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679004301003
Yammarino, F. J., Dionne, S. D., Chun, J. U., & Dansereau, F. (2005). Leadership and levels of analysis: A state-of-the-science review. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(6), 879–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.09.002
Yang, J., & Mossholder, K. W. (2010). Examining the effects of trust in leaders: A bases-and-foci approach. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.10.004
Zhang, S., & Tu, Y. (2018). Cross-domain effects of ethical leadership on employee family and life satisfaction: The moderating role of family-supportive supervisor behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(4), 1085–1097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3306-4
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Michael Palanski, Michelle Hammond, Jayoung Kim, Gretchen Lester, Rachel Clapp Smith
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to Journal of Character & Leadership Development agree to publish their articles under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License. Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to the JCLD.
