New Challenges to Character Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58315/jcld.v10.268Keywords:
Character Education, Social Justice, Empiricism, Higher Education, University, Virtue EthicsAbstract
The recent growth of character education worldwide has met with a number of criticisms. This article applies a humanities methodology to investigate three of these criticisms in the belief that a growing movement can only benefit from attention to its critics. The first criticism is that character education depends on flawed or unreliable social science methods. In response, the article recommends more focused attention on the philosophical foundations of empirical research on character. The second criticism is that character education leaves unjust systems unchallenged. In response, the article recommends increased academic dialogue between character education discourse and social justice discourse. The third criticism is that character education violates the purpose of a university. In response, the article denies the objection, appealing to historical and philosophical sources to argue that character has been and should be at the heart of all Higher Education.
Downloads
References
Biggar, N. (2022). Can theology help? In J. Brant, M. Lamb, & E. Brooks (Eds.), Cultivating virtue in the university (p. 97–111). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197599075.003.0007
Brooks, E., Brant, J., & Lamb, M. (2019). How can universities cultivate leaders of character? Insights from a leadership and character development program at the University of Oxford. International Journal of Ethics Education, 4(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40889-019-00075-x
Bull, A., & Allen, K. (2018). Introduction: Sociological interrogations of the turn to character. Sociological Research Online, 23(2), 392–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780418769672
Cameron, K. S., Bright, D., & Caza, A. (2004). Exploring the relationships between organizational virtuousness and performance. The American Behavioral Scientist, 47(6), 766–790. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764203260209
Carr, D. (2017). Virtue and character in higher education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 65(1), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2016.1224806
Coles, R. (2010). Hunger, ethics, and the university: A radical democratic goad in ten pieces. In E. Kiss & J. P. Euben (Eds.), Debating moral education: Rethinking the role of the modern university, 223–246. Duke University Press.
Doris, J. M. (2002). Lack of character: Personality and moral behavior. Cambridge University Press.
Euben, J. P., & Kiss, E. (2010). Introduction: Why the return to ethics? Why now? In E. Kiss & J. P. Euben (Eds.), Debating moral education: Rethinking the role of the modern university , 3–26. Duke University Press.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1977). Philosophical hermeneutics (D. E. Linge, Trans.). University of California Press.
Hankins, J. (2019). Virtue politics: Soulcraft and statecraft in renaissance Italy. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674242517
Harman, G. (1999). Moral philosophy meets social psychology: Virtue ethics and the fundamental attribution error. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 99(1), 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9264.00062
Hordern, J. (2012). Political affections. Oxford University Press.
Kiss, E., & Euben, J. P. (Eds.). (2010). Debating moral education: Rethinking the role of the modern university. Duke University Press.
Kristjánsson, K. (2013). Ten myths about character, virtue and virtue education – Plus three well-founded misgivings. British Journal of Educational Studies, 61(3), 269–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2013.778386
Lamb, M., Brant, J., & Brooks, E. (2022). Seven strategies for cultivating virtue in the university. In J. Brant, M. Lamb, & E. Brooks (Eds.), Cultivating virtue in the university (p. 115–156). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197599075.003.0007
Lamb, M., Dykhuis, E. M., Mendonça, S. E., & Jayawickreme, E. (2022). Commencing character: A case study of character development in college. Journal of Moral Education, 51(2), 238–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2021.1953451
Little, D. (2009). The heterogeneous social: New thinking about the foundations of the social sciences. In C. Mantzavinos (Ed.), Philosophy of the social sciences: Philosophical theory and scientific practice, 154–178. Cambridge University Press.
Mantzavinos, C. (Ed.). (2009). Philosophy of the social sciences: Philosophical theory and scientific practice. Cambridge University Press.
McIntyre, L. C. (2018). Laws and explanation in the social sciences: Defending a science of human behavior. Routledge.
Taylor, N. (2018). The return of character: Parallels between late-Victorian and twenty-first century discourses. Sociological Research Online, 23(2), 399–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780418769679
Tessman, L. (2005). Burdened virtues: Virtue ethics for liberatory struggles. Oxford University Press.
Williams, R. (2004, June). Oxford University Commemoration Day Sermon. http://rowanwilliams.archbishopofcanterbury.org/articles.php/1637/oxford-university-commemoration-day-sermon.html
Zahl, S. (2019). Non-competitive agency and Luther’s experiential argument against virtue. Modern Theology, 35(2), 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.12410
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Barnabas Aspray
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to Journal of Character & Leadership Development agree to publish their articles under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License. Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to the JCLD.
