Operationalizing the Human Condition, Cultures, and Societies Outcome through the National Character and Leadership Symposium

Authors

  • Peter Swanson United States Air Force Academy
  • Rouven Steeves United States Air Force Academy
  • Michele Johnson United States Air Force Academy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58315/jcld.v11.287

Keywords:

Leadership, Human Condition, NCLS, Outcome, USAFA

Abstract

This paper focuses on the Human Condition, Cultures, and Societies institutional outcome at the United States Air Force Academy (USAFA) and highlights the connection between the outcome and the 2024 National Character and Leadership Symposium (NCLS) theme. Each year, the symposium provides the USAFA community and visitors the opportunity to learn from and engage with nationally recognized speakers. Interactions allow participants to contemplate not only the importance of valuing the human condition but also engage concertedly and compassionately with others. Every four years, the NCLS theme is rooted in the institutional outcome of the Human Condition, Cultures, and Societies. This year’s theme places particular emphasis on precisely the need to know oneself, know others, and to elevate performance through constructive engagement to make a difference, namely learning what each can and must do to value the human condition and human beings. The authors explore how USAFA operationalizes the importance of understanding the human condition as participants transition from the academic classroom to the field to the Air Force and Space Force.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aristotle. (1999). Nicomachean ethics (T. Irwin, Trans. 2nd ed.). Hackett Publishing Company.

DiBiasio, P. A., Vallabhajosula, S., & Eigsti, H. J. (2023). Assessing cultural competence: A comparison of two measures and their utility in global learning experiences within healthcare education. Physiotherapy, 118, 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2022.09.007

Dvir, T., Eden, D., Avolio, B. J., & Shamir, B. (2002). Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 735–744. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069307

Hammer, M. R. (1999). A measure of intercultural sensitivity: The intercultural development inventory. In S. M. Fowler & M. G. Mumford (Eds.), Intercultural source book: Cross-cultural training (Vol. 2, pp. 61–72). Intercultural Press.

Kelloway, E. K., Barling, J., & Helleur, J. (2000). Enhancing transformational leadership: The roles of training and feedback. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 21, 145–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730010325022

Steeves, R. J. (2020). The human condition, cultures, and societies outcome: Who we are determines what we do. Journal of Character and Leadership Development, 7(1), 9–19.

Tocqueville, A. D. (2000). Democracy in America. The University of Chicago Press.

United States Air Force Academy. (2009). The United States Air Force Academy outcomes. https://www.usafa.af.mil/Portals/21/documents/Leadership/PlansAndPrograms/USAFA%20Outcomes.pdf?ver=2015-11-24-175408-140

United States Air Force Academy. (2021). Strategic plan. https://www.usafa.org/AOG/StrategicPlanning

United States Air Force Academy. (2023). Let’s be clear. https://www.usafa.edu/cadet-life/lets-be-clear/

United States Air Force Academy. (2022). USAFA Manual 36-3526, Developing Leaders of Character at USAFA. https://static.e-publishing.af.mil/production/1/usafa/publication/usafaman36-3526/usafaman36-3526.pdf

Published

2024-03-11

How to Cite

Swanson, P., Steeves, R., & Johnson, M. (2024). Operationalizing the Human Condition, Cultures, and Societies Outcome through the National Character and Leadership Symposium. Journal of Character and Leadership Development, 11(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.58315/jcld.v11.287

Issue

Section

Program/Intervention

Categories